{"component":"LOGIC_CORE","processor_type":"Governance Runtime — Semantic Instruction Set","instruction_set":{"ILJO_loop":{"sequence":["INTENT","LOGIC","JUDGMENT","OUTCOME"],"sequence_rule":"Non-negotiable. Enforced by schema structure.","semiotic_mapping":{"INTENT":"Sign","LOGIC":"Object relationship — grounded in signals","JUDGMENT":"Interpretant — under governance constants","OUTCOME":"Closes triad — becomes Sign for next cycle"}},"governance_constants_required":["SOVEREIGNTY","PRIMUM"],"governance_constants":{"SOVEREIGNTY":{"name":"Sovereignty Gate","plain_language":"Human authority over consequential external action is always preserved. Ledger commit is the auditable record that makes this boundary enforceable — it is permitted and required. SOVEREIGNTY governs what the system does beyond the ledger, not the act of recording.","rule":"No autonomous execution of consequential external action without human authorization. Ledger commit is an auditable governance record, not an external action — it is permitted under SOVEREIGNTY. What requires human authorization is any action taken in the world based on the committed reasoning. When uncertainty is HIGH, the system stops and defers to human authority rather than proceeding toward external action.","enforcement":"Required in GCA.SUPEREGO.anchors_present. DER fails compile without it.","proxy_checks":["When BOUNDEDNESS.uncertainty = HIGH, BOUNDEDNESS.stop_on_uncertainty must be true","BOUNDEDNESS block must be present","JUDGMENT must acknowledge uncertainty scope when uncertainty >= MED"],"NIST_alignment":"GOVERN 1.2 — accountability structure and human oversight","formerly":"Psi_808 (alias retained for backward compatibility with existing ledger entries)"},"PRIMUM":{"name":"Primum Non Nocere — First Do No Harm","plain_language":"When in doubt, do not proceed. The system fails closed when harm potential exists under uncertainty. It does not reason past ambiguity toward consequential outcomes.","rule":"Harm prohibition gate. When uncertainty is HIGH and the outcome has consequential human impact, the system must stop, not proceed. Fail closed under uncertainty. Required for any DER involving human welfare.","enforcement":"Required in GCA.SUPEREGO.anchors_present. DER fails compile without it.","proxy_checks":["When BOUNDEDNESS.uncertainty = HIGH, ILJO.OUTCOME must reflect STOP, DELAY, or PENDING — not a committed consequential action","When stop_reason = INSUFFICIENT_SIGNAL, JUDGMENT must acknowledge the gap, not reason past it","When DECISION_INTENT.impact_domain is HUMAN_WELFARE, SAFETY_CRITICAL, or LEGAL, OUTCOME_PLAN.rollback_condition is required — deterministically enforceable by compile gate"],"NIST_alignment":"MANAGE 2.2 — risk treatment; MANAGE 4.1 — residual risk tracking","formerly":"Psi_888 (alias retained for backward compatibility with existing ledger entries)"}}},"record_contract":{"name":"SDI_DER","version":"SDI_DER_v1.1","schema":{"SDI_DER":{"META":{"der_version":"SDI_DER_v1.1","utc":"ISO_8601","hash_alg":"SHA-384","protocol":"SDI_PROTOCOL_v1","agent_id":"SDI-XXXXXXXXXXXX (or SESSION_LOCAL)","sovereign_hash":"0x... (optional; external mint-agent)","ledger":{"type":"EPISODIC|PRECEDENT|CALIBRATION|AUDIT|SYSTEM","parent_hash":"GENESIS|0x...|SESSION_LOCAL","expected_parent_hash":"OPTIONAL_CAS_GUARD"}},"DECISION_INTENT":{"context_framing":"STRING — why this reasoning is happening","intent_statement":"STRING — what is being decided or answered","role":"STRING — operator or system role","tier":"Strategic|Operational|Tactical","impact_domain":"LOW_RISK | HUMAN_WELFARE | SAFETY_CRITICAL | FINANCIAL | LEGAL — determines which compile gate proxy checks are activated. HUMAN_WELFARE, SAFETY_CRITICAL, and LEGAL trigger rollback_condition enforcement in OUTCOME_PLAN. Compiler warns when absent and defaults runtime interpretation to LOW_RISK."},"QUESTION_LOGIC":{"strategic_question":"STRING","sub_questions":[{"id":"q1","prompt":"STRING","linked_signal_ids":["signal_01"],"success_standard":{"definition":"STRING — what constitutes sufficient evidence to answer this sub-question","framework_source":{"name":"STRING — governance framework informing this criterion (e.g. NIST AI RMF MEASURE 2.5)","retrieved_utc":"ISO_8601 — required when source is external","url":"STRING — retrievable URL if available"}}}]},"DECISION_SYNTAX":{"strategic_question_id":"Q-XXXX (optional)","sub_question_grammar":[{"id":"q1","pattern":"THRESHOLD|COMPARISON|BOOLEAN_CHECK|EXISTS|WITHIN_WINDOW","lhs":"STRING","op":"==|>=|<=|>|<|CONTAINS|MEETS|WITHIN","rhs":"NUMBER|STRING|BOOLEAN","window":"STRING_OPTIONAL"}]},"SUCCESS_STANDARD":{"definition":"STRING — what counts as success","threshold_type":"Binary|Numeric|Time-bound|Qualitative|Qualitative/Deterministic","operator":"==|>=|<=|>|<|CONTAINS|MEETS|WITHIN","target":"NUMBER|STRING|BOOLEAN","window":"STRING_OPTIONAL","framework_source":{"name":"STRING — governance framework informing this success criterion","retrieved_utc":"ISO_8601","url":"STRING"},"audit_standard":{"definition":"STRING — how a human can reconstruct the decision from this record alone","required_artifacts":["ARRAY of strings"],"pass_fail_rule":"STRING"}},"SYSTEM_INPUT":{"inputs":[{"signal_id":"signal_01","source_system":"HUMAN|SYSTEM|EXTERNAL|DOC|DB|WEB","raw_value":"ANY — quote, number, doc snippet, reference","captured_utc":"ISO_8601","provenance":"STRING — who, what, where, how captured","citation":{"title":"STRING — document or source title","url":"STRING — retrievable URL (required when source_system is WEB or EXTERNAL)","retrieved_utc":"ISO_8601 — date of retrieval (required when source_system is WEB or EXTERNAL)","version_or_date":"STRING — document version or publication date if known","note":"A signal citing NIST AI RMF retrieved 2026-03-04 is a verifiable governance claim. A signal asserting NIST from training memory is an unverifiable assertion."},"insight_dimensions":{"actionability":"1-5","relevance":"1-5","predictive_value":"1-5","specificity":"1-5","measurability":"1-5"},"insight_strength":"1-5 — must equal min of all 5 dimensions (deterministically computed)","scoring_rule":"insight_strength = min(actionability, relevance, predictive_value, specificity, measurability)","signal_useful_rule":"signal_useful = true if relevance >= 4, even if insight_strength <= 2","evidence_grade":"OPTIONAL — future: A/B/C/D/F"}]},"ILJO":{"INTENT":"STRING — anchored decision objective (Sign in triadic structure)","LOGIC":"STRING — objective derivations grounded in SYSTEM_INPUT signals. No policy or decision language. Object relationship in triadic closure.","JUDGMENT":"STRING — bounded verdict under SOVEREIGNTY and PRIMUM. Anchors referenced explicitly. Stop decisions acknowledged. The Interpretant.","OUTCOME":"STRING — committed state. Becomes Sign for next cycle. May be N/A in pre-platform build.","sequence_note":"ILJO sequence is non-negotiable. Enforced by schema structure."},"GCA":{"ID":"STRING — raw candidate stream. No finality claims.","EGO":"STRING — structured SDI reasoning trace grounded in signals.","SUPEREGO":{"anchors_required":"ARRAY — governance constants this DER must honor","anchors_present":"ARRAY — governance constants the model declares are honored","note":"Declaration is Level 1. Proxy scoring is Level 2. Human JUDGMENT audit is Level 3."}},"BOUNDEDNESS":{"uncertainty":"LOW|MED|HIGH","max_uncertainty_allowed":"LOW|MED|HIGH","timebox_seconds":"NUMBER","stop_on_uncertainty":"BOOLEAN — must be true when uncertainty = HIGH (SOVEREIGNTY proxy)","stop_reason":"INSUFFICIENT_SIGNAL|HIGH_UNCERTAINTY|TIMEBOX_EXCEEDED|POLICY_BLOCK"},"OUTCOME_PLAN":{"planned_metrics":[{"metric":"STRING","target":"STRING|NUMBER","measurement_method":"STRING","review_window":"STRING","rollback_condition":"STRING — required when DER involves human welfare (PRIMUM proxy)"}]},"METRICS":{"RAI":"0.0–1.0","Jc":"NUMBER — tokens in committed artifact","Jp":"NUMBER — input tokens processed by model","delta_E":"NUMBER — Jp minus Jc (governance efficiency signal)","ID_tokens_est":"NUMBER","_note":"OPTIONAL — example or annotation field. Authoritative metric values are computed at runtime by external Logic Node."}}},"note":"Governance proven by SDI_DER + constants + deterministic signal scoring + compile pass."},"decision_syntax":{"patterns":["THRESHOLD","COMPARISON","BOOLEAN_CHECK","EXISTS","WITHIN_WINDOW"],"operators":["==",">=","<=",">","<","CONTAINS","MEETS","WITHIN"],"note":"Sub-questions SHOULD use pattern + lhs + op + rhs to reduce free-form drift and enable deterministic evaluation."},"governance_efficiency":{"equation":"Ec = I · S²","function":"computeCompileMetrics(der, anchorsPresent) → Ec via calculateGovernanceEnergy(tier, syntaxCompleteness, anchorTightness)","status":"Proposed formalism — computable from compile gate output. Returned in every compile response."}}